CategoriesIBSi Blogs Uncategorized

Don’t be an open window: combatting cyber threats for private equity firms and their portfolio companies

Like most criminals, cyber hackers want an easy life. Just as burglars prefer forgotten open windows over picking front door locks as a way in, so their digital counterparts are looking for targets that offer maximum return for minimum effort.

Jason Elmer, Founder and CEO, Drawbridge

by Jason Elmer, Founder and CEO, Drawbridge

As such, while major corporations wise up to the threat of sophisticated attackers and invest in the sort of defences that limit the impact of bad actors, criminals are now turning their attention to potentially easier targets. And that includes businesses that are raising capital or those that recently announced funding – particularly when those businesses not only hold significant financial data but also potentially offer gateways, or open windows, to other companies.

It’s thus no surprise that ransomware attacks are increasingly targeting Private Equity (PE) firms and their portfolio companies (PortCos). As attacks increase, it’s imperative that investors become more aware of the risks they face and take swift action to protect themselves – and their portfolio companies.

Cyber vigilance as a differentiator

Cyber vigilance is increasingly becoming a differentiator for investors when considering companies to add to their portfolios. Gartner highlighted that “by 2025, 60% of organizations will use cybersecurity risk as a primary determinant in conducting third-party transactions and business engagements,” and in doing so noted that “Investors, especially venture capitalists, are using cybersecurity risk as a key factor in assessing opportunities.”

There’s also regulatory pressure to get houses in order. In February, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) voted to propose a new set of cybersecurity rules to oversee how alternative investments or private capital firms manage risk, requiring clear policies and procedures to be put in place. In addition, advisers would need to report incidents that impact their firms, funds or clients.

Clearly, PEs need to be as rigorous in checking their own windows are closed as they are in running the rule on the security posture of target companies. For most, it means a wholesale change in their approach to cyber security. The question is, how do they begin to implement this new approach? Securing your own operations is hard enough – how do you extend that to other entities in your orbit?

Check your windows

First, it’s worth considering what open windows there could be. One of the most glaring yet overlooked open windows is the employees at PEs and their PortCos. This isn’t to suggest that everyone is maliciously trying to undermine their employer (though insider attacks do happen), more that too often an assumption is made that workers understand the ways in which they can be targeted.

The reality is that many people don’t realize how many cyber threats are designed to exploit people’s ignorance or naivety. From ransomware to phishing attacks, many of the major leaks we read about in the news can be traced back to individuals who didn’t realize they shouldn’t click on a link, open a suspicious attachment or download an app at work.

Like any good burglar- why would a cyber thief spend time trying to crack encrypted corporate networks when they could simply gain access by targeting unsuspecting employees? They wouldn’t. That’s why

the first step in any PE firm’s cyber security approach should be to focus on educating staff, starting with the PE firm itself and then extending out to its PortCos to ensure they are undertaking similar processes.

Similarly, it’s not too difficult for attackers to take advantage of a lax approach to updating software. Technology is constantly evolving, and changes to critical systems can bring immense business benefits and operational efficiencies – but can also create new gaps in defences. PE firms and their PortCos must ensure that they have a rigorous and consistent process to keep systems up to date and fix bugs as solutions are released to prevent attackers from exploiting any holes.

Sophisticated responses for new attacks

Those are just two of the windows that can be closed relatively quickly. But the fact is that attacks are becoming more sophisticated, which means the responses must too.

Only real-time cyber risk monitoring will enable firms to protect their most sensitive data and safeguard against internal and external threats. That means firms must have more than the traditionally adequate technical and logical controls – they need active, continuous risk mitigation solutions and reporting, and cyber programs that are tested using real-world scenarios that provide a clear picture of how the business would defend against and respond to an incident.

A case of when, not if

Ultimately, PE firms and their PortCos need to realize that it is a case of when, not if, they are targeted. Most businesses understand and accept it; what they will not accept is inaction, attempts to hide issues, or a failure to mitigate the impact.

That’s why the new SEC rules are pushing for incidents to be reported, and why the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has fines in place for companies that have not done everything they can to reduce the risk of data breaches. Those businesses that do not do everything in their power to respond appropriately to incidents will not only have to deal with the immediate fallout of the attack itself, but subsequent legal, financial and reputational consequences.

Close the windows to protect firms and PortCos

It’s one thing to be undone by a sophisticated attack that may be far ahead of any of your existing defences; it is quite another for an opportune bad actor to sneak in via an open window. Cybersecurity is challenging, and it’s only becoming more complicated as attackers become more sophisticated and geopolitical threats rise. It’s clear that if there was ever a time to pay attention to cyber risk and buttress your defences, it is now.

The best way for PE firms and their PortCos to protect their organizations is to make it as hard as possible for cyber attackers to gain access.  Invest in the right real-time cyber risk monitoring, confirm all your systems are patched and up to date and have your comprehensive incident response plan tested and ready to go on a moment’s notice. Put simply: Don’t be an open window.

CategoriesIBSi Blogs Uncategorized

How the FinTech industry can take a stand on financial and environmental sustainability

Keith Tully, Real Business Rescue

FinTech is synonymous with innovation and is a key industry in this country. Its influence spans the globe, however, and makes it a primary player in the move towards greater financial and environmental sustainability.

by Keith Tully, Real Business Rescue, a company insolvency and restructuring expert.

Corporate social responsibility has been a pivotal business model for decades, but the 2021 COP26 Climate Change Conference in Glasgow clarified the urgency to act with purpose and laid out in stark detail the consequences for the planet if we don’t.

The FinTech industry is ideally placed to use its prominent standing on the global stage, therefore, and positively influence the crucial issues we face. It can set a ‘green’ example for others to follow, ensuring businesses adopt sustainable practices and leading the way towards a lower-carbon future for industries across the board.

How can Fintech businesses take a stand on sustainability?

Operate a ‘green’ supply chain

Fintech’s inherent use of big data, artificial intelligence, and real-time information, makes the industry a perfect role model when implementing environmentally friendly and sustainable logistical practices.

Transparency and collaboration between supply chain members is a necessity for a ‘green’ supply chain to work, and this ultimately reduces waste and increases cost-effectiveness for all participants.

Develop ‘green’ technologies

The industry continues to provide cutting-edge solutions that streamline and modernise financial procedures and payment systems, and can positively influence corporate behaviours.

Brand reputation strengthens when businesses use innovative financial technologies – they become trustworthy within their industry and in the eyes of the wider community. The investment in ‘green’ solutions consolidates the drive for sustainability and enables ethical conduct and business behaviours to be put in place.

Innovative banking and payment solutions

The banking and payments industries have transitioned, almost beyond recognition, in the last few decades. Although the ‘traditional’ high street banking services are still available, the development of new financial technologies has created a thoroughly modern alternative for businesses and individuals.

The Fintech industry has developed highly sophisticated, cost-effective, and sustainable banking and payment systems that help businesses reduce their carbon footprint. Blockchain is one such example, and this provides a platform that supports other technologies such as new payment and finance solutions.

Data analytics

Big data provides in-depth perspective and insight into various areas of business and offers key decision-makers a solid foundation for making strategic plans. It can also be used to keep a business on track towards financial and environmental sustainability.

Global financial services group, BBVA, uses technology to help organisations calculate their carbon footprint using data analytics, for example. Businesses can calculate their carbon footprint and then register on The Carbon Footprint Registry.

The ‘Climate Registered’ seal placed on their websites and promotional materials demonstrates the business’ commitment to sustainability, and to reducing their carbon footprint.

Make sustainability the USP

Adopting good practices and promoting financial and environmental sustainability enables Fintech companies to differentiate themselves, and to stand out in an increasingly crowded industry.

Making sustainability their unique selling point within a ‘Green Fintech’ umbrella of innovative technologies and working practices reiterates the drive to help tackle climate change whilst promoting a sense of purpose and well-being among staff.

Sustainable financial products

Figures published by Statista show how significantly Fintech solutions have changed the way in which we bank and carry out our financial business as a nation.

In 2007, only 30 per cent of banking customers regularly used digital banking services, a figure that has risen to 76 per cent in 2020. Personal finance budgeting and investment apps also help people achieve their own individual goals for sustainability.

Fintech businesses can measure and verify the impact of sustainable financial products, such as ‘green’ bonds, loans, and investment funds, and make adjustments as necessary to improve the products.

The case for taking a stand on financial and environmental sustainability

The positive case for taking a stand on sustainability is clear. It’s what is needed if we are to head off total climate catastrophe. This movement also holds significant benefits for individual businesses in terms of their reputation and place in the community, however.

Sustainability is an issue close to people’s hearts, and staff can rally around such a cause. This increases morale and creates an inclusive working environment that promotes well-being and productivity.

Apart from the key benefit of creating a more sustainable operating environment for businesses within the industry, Fintech’s considerable influence could also affect far-reaching change in other industries.

In fact, Fintech is in the perfect position to lead on financial and environmental sustainability. Introducing new ‘green’ financial products and creative payment systems not only helps other businesses on a practical level, but also sets the high environmental and financial sustainability standards that we need, and that others will follow.

CategoriesIBSi Blogs Uncategorized

How FinTechs are reacting to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine

Alex Malyshev, CEO, SDK.finance
Alex Malyshev, CEO, SDK.finance

As nations worldwide continue to sanction Russia in condemnation of their invasion of Ukraine, companies have now joined the movement to exclude the Russian government – and sometimes Russians – from their list of clients. Some of these companies have decided to ban them following international sanction provisions from The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC).

by Alex Malyshev, CEO, SDK.finance

Others have taken this decision as a show of solidarity with the Ukrainian people. However, not all FinTech companies are placing blanket boycotts on Russian citizens. The most notable holdouts are Binance and Kraken, citing the argument that banning “innocent Russians” goes against the philosophy behind cryptocurrencies.

So, let’s go through the reactions of fintech companies to the Russian invasion and explore how they affect the socio-economic climate in Russia and the rest of the world.

SWIFT

As pressure mounted on SWIFT to respond to the Russian invasion, the payment network obliged by suspending 7 major Russian banks from performing transactions indefinitely. The ban stops these Russian banks from accessing their global economic resources, but the country has outlined measures to combat the hard-hitting impacts of the SWIFT suspension. In anticipation of incoming economic sanctions, the Russian government developed SPFS (System for Transfer of Financial Messages) — a SWIFT equivalent that works only in Russia and some banks in Switzerland, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, Cuba, and Belarus.

Russia now has to rely on China’s more formidable Cross-border Interbank Payment System (CIPS) for international transactions.

VISA

According to Statista, VISA owns 12% of all credit payment cards in the world (335 million credit cards), accounting for about 50% of the overall market shares. The company reacted to the Russian invasion by halting all its operations within Russia and banning Russian VISA cardholders from processing transactions.

According to VISA’s official statement, the company is ‘taking prompt action to ensure compliance with applicable sanctions, and is prepared to comply with additional sanctions that may be implemented’. The VISA Foundation has also donated a $2 million grant to the US Fund for UNICEF to provide the Ukrainian people with humanitarian aid.

Mastercard

Mastercard has maintained the same ironclad stance as VISA on the Russian invasion. The credit card company has reportedly forfeited about 4% of potential revenue by excluding Russians from its services.

Mastercard CEO Michael Miebach released a statement saying that the company has ceased operations in Russia, as well as banned certain Russian banks from the payment network. Miebach also affirms that the company has sent a $2 million humanitarian fund to the Red Cross, Save the Children, and employee assistance.

Amex

American Express has also joined the ranks of Visa and Mastercard in suspending all operations in Russia and Belarus. According to a memo from American Express CEO Stephen J. Squeri, the cards issued in Russian territory will no longer work in Russia or outside the country. As part of Amex’s “Do What is Right” code, the company has pledged $1 million to humanitarian organizations to provide relief to people in Ukraine affected by the war.

Source: Mykhailo Fedorov (Ukraine’s Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Digital Transformation) on Twitter

PayPal

PayPal has also halted all operations in Russia until further notice. Dan Schulman, PayPal CEO, released a statement saying: “PayPal supports the Ukrainian people and stands with the international community in condemning Russia’s violent military aggression in Ukraine. The tragedy taking place in Ukraine is devastating for all of us, wherever we are in the world.” He goes on to add that despite banning Russians from using PayPal’s services, the company will still provide support for Russian citizens within its workforce.

Payoneer

Payoneer’s reaction was to stop all issuance of cards to customers with postal or residential addresses within the Russian Federation. According to the company’s updated FAQs, Russian citizens with Payoneer cards issued outside Russia can still conduct transactions without restrictions.

Upwork

In an open letter to freelancers, Upwork CEO Hayden Brown reiterated the company’s mission to help improve people’s lives. As a result, with over 4% of registered freelancers from Russia and Belarus, Upwork has suspended operations and has shut down support for new business generation in both countries. To this end, the changes will take full effect on 1 May 2022, leaving freelancers and clients in Russia and Belarus unable to create new accounts, initiate new contracts, and appear in searches. The platform also donated $1 million to Direct Relief International to support Ukrainian citizens caught up in the war.

Revolut

As a company with a Ukrainian co-founder Vlad Yatsenko, Revolut has provided unwavering support for Ukrainians suffering from the war. The current CEO Nikolay Storonsky, born in Russia to a Ukrainian father, released an open letter, categorically condemning the war, saying that ‘this war is wrong and totally abhorrent’ and that ‘…not one more person should die in this needless conflict’.

In a statement titled The War on Ukraine: Our Response, Revolut has affirmed its dedication to uphold and impose sanctions placed on Russia. As part of its support to Ukraine, Revolut has removed transfer fees for every transaction going into the country. The company has also pledged to match every donation made to the Red Cross Ukraine appeal.

Stripe

Although Stripe does not work in Ukraine, Russia, or Belarus, the financial services and SaaS company has pledged to impose sanctions on the Russian government and its citizens. The extent of this ban will cover transactions using the Mir payment system, as well as services linked directly or indirectly with the Crimea and the separatist Luhansk and Donetsk regions.

Paysera

Paysera has released a comprehensive list of financial restrictions on Russia and its allies involved in the Ukrainian invasion:

  • Russian citizens will no longer be able to use Paysera (this restriction does not apply to Russian citizens with residency or work permits in other supported countries).
  • All current accounts belonging to Russians will be closed.
  • Russian and Belarusian companies are banned from using their Paysera accounts.
  • All current business accounts belonging to Russian and Belarusian entities will be closed.
  • Transactions to Russian and Belarusian banks between private individuals will continue but must go through rigorous verification procedures.
  • Paysera will roll back all money transfers from Russian and Belarusian banks received on Monday (23 February and later).
  • Paysera users can no longer exchange to Russian Roubles (RUB).

This list is only one part of the extensive regulation changes for Russian citizens and banks. For more information, read the entire press release.

Apple (Apple Pay) and Google (Google Pay)

Apple and Google set rivalries aside to impose a collective ban on the Russian government and its citizens for their actions in Ukraine. According to NPR, Apple will stop shipping products to Russia with immediate effect. This announcement sent shockwaves around the tech world because of the company’s global influence.

In the same vein, Google has also removed media platforms RT and Sputnik from its services, banning their content within EU countries.

But that’s not even half of it. Apple has furthered its crackdown on Russia by deactivating its payment service Apple Pay in the region – 29% of Russians rely on Apple Pay for contactless payments. Similar to Apple, Google Pay (used by 20% of Russians) has also ceased all digital payments by Russian citizens within occupied territories.

Money transfer services

According to Statista, the value of cross-border money transfers made by Russians in 2020 were worth over $40 billion, which is by almost $8 billion less than in 2018. In 2022, however, this sum is likely to be much lower taken the situation with the money transfer services that are leaving the Russian market.

Western Union

On 10 March 2022, Western Union issued a press release announcing that all the company’s operations in Russia and Belarus will be suspended with immediate effect. For the people of Ukraine, Western Union has created a donation portal to address the humanitarian and refugee crisis, according to Elizabeth Executive Director of the Western Union Foundation.

The money transfer company has pledged $500 000 to provide humanitarian aid to the Ukrainian people. To donate to the Western Union Foundation, visit its official website.

Wise

Before the 2022 Russian-Ukrainian war, Wise (formerly TransferWise) had already placed a $200 limit for Russian account owners. With the current swathe of sanctions, the remittance and payments company has doubled down on its restriction for individuals and businesses within the Russian Federation and its (illegally) occupied territories.

Find a detailed breakdown of the restrictions according to the company’s Help Centre below:

  • You can only send RUB to private bank accounts or cards in Russia.
  • You cannot send RUB to government agencies in Russia.
  • You cannot send RUB to Crimea or Sevastopol.
  • You cannot send USD or EUR to accounts in Russia.

MoneyGram

According to Quartz, MoneyGram still works both in Ukraine and Russia since the sanctioned banks — Sberbank (Russian) and VTB — are not involved in the transactions directly. This same report also shows that, on the first day of the invasion, US-based remittances to Ukraine spiked 120%, while the number rose to 50% in Russia. Nevertheless, MoneyGram has removed all fees on transfers going to Ukraine from the US, Canada, and EU.

Remitly

Remitly is a P2P service that allows immigrants to send money across borders. Since the company’s core demographics (immigrants) are closely aligned to the plight of Ukrainian refugees, it is no surprise that tit has also banned Russia. Remitly, through a spokesperson, has communicated its dedication to upholding this ban according to the EU and US sanctions.

Source: World Remit on Twitter
Source: World Remit on Twitter

Zepz (WorldRemit)

Zepz, formerly WorldRemit, has released a list of countries on its banned list, including Russia and Belarus. The company also released an updated list of transaction conditions, showing that Russia is on the blocklist until further notice.

“The Big Four”

Members of the Big Four — Deloitte, Ernst & Young, KPMG, and PwC — have also enforced the sanctions imposed on Russia by the US and EU nations. At the time of compiling this report, the aforementioned companies are not in a hurry to impose blanket sanctions on all Russian citizens since a combined 1.1% (around 13000 people) of their global workforce is in Russia.

Deloitte’s Global CEO Punit Renjen said: “Last week, Deloitte announced it was reviewing its business in Russia. We will separate our practice in Russia and Belarus from the global network of member firms. Deloitte will no longer operate in Russia and Belarus.”

Mark Walters, KPMG’s Global Head of Communications, said: “KPMG has over 4,500 people in Russia and Belarus, and ending our working relationship with them, many of whom have been a part of KPMG for many decades, is incredibly difficult.”

Mike Davies, PwC’s Director of Global Corporate Affairs and Communications, PwC UK, said: “As a result of the Russian government’s invasion of Ukraine, we have decided that, under the circumstances, PwC should not have a member firm in Russia and consequently PwC Russia will leave the network.”

EY released a statement that said: “Today, EY global organisation decided that the Russian practice will continue working with clients as an independent group of audit and consulting companies that are not part of the EY global network. The changes will take effect after the required transition period.”

Source: Mykhailo Fedorov on Twitter
Source: Mykhailo Fedorov on Twitter

The crypto world

Although the major players in FinTech are equivocal in their condemnation and boycott (full or partial) of Russia, the crypto community maintains partial neutrality. The overarching sentiment within the world of crypto is that private citizens should not suffer due to the actions of their governments. After all, some of these individuals might be using cryptocurrencies to oppose tyrannical regimes.

Notwithstanding, the Russian Central Bank has proposed a ban on mining and trading cryptocurrencies. With Russia occupying third place among Bitcoin mining regions globally, the impacts on the value and volatility of the crypto market might be extensive.

On its part, Ukraine has also used crypto assets to fund its defence against Russian aggression. Ukraine’s Deputy Prime Minister Mykhailo Fedorov has also posted wallet addresses for the Ukrainian Army and Civil Defense support.

Kraken statement
Source: Jesse Powell on Twitter

Kraken

CEO of Kraken, Jesse Powell released a Twitter thread in response to the Ukrainian Prime Minister’s call on crypto exchanges to block addresses of all Russian users. In the thread, he expresses regret for the appalling conditions Ukraine finds itself in at the hands of its aggressive neighbours. However, he insists that the company cannot blanket-ban citizens ‘without a legal requirement’ to do so.

Binance

Binance CEO, Changpeng Zhao, released a detailed statement refuting claims that ‘Binance doesn’t apply sanctions’. He expressed that Russian individuals banned by US and EU sanction regulations are not allowed to trade on Binance.

KuCoin

KuCoin CEO Johnny Lyu also refuses to freeze the accounts of Russian users, unless there is a legal precedent to do so on a case-by-case basis.In a statement to CNBC, the CEO expressed KuCoin’s stance on the issue: “As a neutral platform, we will not freeze the accounts of any users from any country without a legal requirement. And at this difficult time, actions that increase the tension to impact the rights of innocent people should not be encouraged.”

Source: Brian Armstrong on Twitter
Source: Brian Armstrong on Twitter

Coinbase

According to Coinbase’s Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal, the company has blocked over 25000 accounts linked with “illicit activity” with the Russian government and its allies. While the crypto exchange is dedicated to helping the Ukrainians, they refused to freeze the assets of ‘ordinary Russians’.

Nevertheless, Coinbase has implemented measures to monitor attempts by sanctioned individuals to evade the restrictions. The crypto exchange will also follow recommendations that align with government recommendations, provided they don’t interfere with individual rights.

Adyen

Although the Ayden network does not work in either Russia or Ukraine, the company has decided to offer humanitarian help to the victims of the ongoing invasion. Adyen’s policy decisions include:

  • Blocking sanctioned banks and private entities
  • Suspending US and EU processing services in Russia, Crimea, and the separatist regions in Donetsk and Luhansk.
  • Suspending transaction processing in Russian rubles (RUB) regardless of issuing country.

To the Ukrainian people, Adyen has pledged humanitarian support through Adyen Giving and other charities like the UNCHR Disaster Relief Fund, Giro 555, and the Red Cross.

Mintos

The loan management platform Mintos has removed loans from Russian and Ukrainian lending platforms as a ‘cautionary measure’ to protect lenders from the unprecedented repercussions of the invasion. As part of the Mintos Conservative Strategy, the company will uphold these restrictions until the conflict stabilises – or ends.

eToro

When eToro announced that it would be force-liquidating Magnit PJSC stocks (and other related Russian stocks), they probably didn’t expect such a massive amount of pushback from users who had equities in these companies. As a result of the criticism and public outcry, the company refunded all affected parties, except for leverage stakes. Despite the earlier wave of backlash, eToro is still considering what to do with nine other stocks from the country, including Sberbank of Russia, Rosneft  (RNFTF), Gazprom, and Lukoil.

Conclusion

The Russo-Ukrainian war has plunged the entire financial sector into a new reality, which follows post-pandemic inflation. We are now witnessing an unprecedented situation – financial institutions and FinTech companies are reacting in real-time to impose sanctions and boycotts on Russia and its citizens. Numerous companies that aren’t obliged by law or sanctions have taken the initiative to leave the Russian market. These decisions cost each of them a significant part of revenue, yet they demonstrate the willingness to pay this price in order to help stop the war.

CategoriesIBSi Blogs Uncategorized

The future of banking: Are we seeing a new categorisation of bank emerge as the industry evolves?

The banking industry has undergone huge change in recent years, and so too have its players. As such, the time-honoured classifications of ‘incumbent’, ‘challenger’ and ‘neobank’ no longer sufficiently describe a bank’s offering, role or position in the industry;  arguably some incumbents are proving to take more ‘challenging’ strategies than some of their comparatively younger challenger or neobanks. So how will banks be defined in the future?

Rivo Uibo, Co-Founder and Chief Business Officer at Tuum

by Rivo Uibo, Co-Founder and Chief Business Officer at Tuum 

The evolution of banking is partly in response to an underlying shift in the way that people live and work and the demand across diverse demographics for more tailored banking services. Freelance workers have different banking needs to employees; the needs of Gen Z customers, such as saving money and managing subscriptions (including Spotify, Netflix etc.) are far removed from those of older generations. In essence, to prosper in today’s banking industry, banks must now find a means of being relevant to diverse customer demands and desires and provide these banking services in the most convenient way.

In tandem with this trend, the advent of embedded finance, open banking and APIs together with the rise of new entrants to the market including tech giants and superapps and demand aggregators (brands that provide financial services on top of their core offerings such as Alipay, Uber payments or Gusto wallet), are adding further complexity to the banking landscape and the number and diversity of players.

Banks are therefore under pressure to maintain market share and are looking at different approaches to achieve this. Let’s look at the different business strategies that banks are pursuing today and where these business models are likely to lead to.

High street banks

Even before the pandemic, high street banks were ramping up their digital offerings and reducing their number of branches. But in the wake of the pandemic and soaring demand for digital banking, high street banks face strong competition from online-only banks. As a result, they have radically reduced their number of branches; according to a report by Which? published in December 2021, almost 5000 UK bank branches had closed since 2015 or were set to close in 2022.

That being said, In the UK, high street banks offering personal and business banking (including RBS, Barclays, Lloyds and HSBC) are still regarded as the market leaders and mainstays of the industry. Only time will tell if their (albeit reduced) in-person banking services and industry standing will be enough to survive heightened competition from their more nimble digital counterparts. In the meantime, these mainstream banks will be closely analysing the options open to them to maintain customer share (greater focus on digital/focus on other market segments).

Digital banks

These forward-thinking, online-only banks provide banking services that fully reap the efficiency benefits of modern technological capabilities. Leading digital banks currently include the likes of Monzo, Nubank and N26. These large players, which started out as ambitious neobanks, have succeeded in gaining a sizeable customer base through innovative, digital service offerings. N26 is today one of the most valued banks in Germany and is aiming to be one of the biggest retail banks in Europe (without having a single branch) while Nubank boasts 40 million customers in Brazil.

Aside from these larger successful players, many digital banks tend to be niche players, laser-focused on the banking needs of one specific customer group. These financial service providers are made up of both those who have their own licence and those that depend on other banks or banking platforms for their licence – but both are perceived equally by end-users as ‘digital banks’. Their strategy is to gain maximum traction within their target customer segment and then expand and enhance their service offerings. A great example of a niche digital bank is Jefa, a LATAM bank set up by women for women, offering free accounts, a debit card, and a mobile app to assist money management. With the defaults of banking in LATAM broadly hostile to women customers, Jefa is making headway in a giant untapped market that has been ignored by other banks. Another good example is New York-based Daylight, a digital bank that offers services specifically tailored to meet the needs and assist with the financial challenges of LGBTQ+ people and their families.

Notably, as long as a financial institution is fully regulated and users’ money is protected, customers are beginning to show less loyalty for long-standing banks and are increasingly motivated by innovative services and excellent customer experience from digital banks. The rise of platform players – in the form of next-generation core banking and BaaS platforms are playing a key role in enabling digital banks to quickly roll out new tailored banking services and driving innovation in everyday banking.

Multifaceted banks

These banks succeed in functioning in multiple modes; they successfully provide banking services directly to their own diverse customer base while also opening up their infrastructure to provide the technology and licence to third parties.

Goldman Sachs is a key example of such a bank today. It launched a consumer banking brand, Marcus, in 2016, together with a new transaction banking unit, which amassed $97 billion and $28 billion in deposits by 2020 respectively. Goldman Sachs opens up the underlying infrastructure that powers Marcus and its transaction banking unit to external third parties as well, such as Stripe or Apple. By leveraging both its balance sheet and regulatory expertise as well as a modern platform, it is an attractive embedded banking partner for large sticky brands.

Starling Bank is another (online) bank that together with providing award-winning digital banking services to its own customers (it has been voted Best British Bank in the British Bank Awards for the last four years), it also offers its own infrastructure to other banks and fintechs in order for them to roll out financial services.

As embedded finance and the rollout of financial services by non-banks takes off, banks that can offer their infrastructure and banking licences will become increasingly in demand.

Only time will tell exactly what the banking landscape will look like in the future but what is very clear is that the age-old classifications of banks need reconsidering. And in order to survive and thrive banks themselves need to decide what path to take. We are entering a stage in the evolution of the sector where there is no clear roadmap for a given incumbent or a given challenger bank. Each individual bank needs to assess its strengths and ambitions and re-evaluate its strategy to carve out its own place in the industry.

The growing demand for personalised and relevant services will mean that only a minority of banks will be able to operate on multiple levels because it is hard for a bank to be everything to everybody. In the meantime, advances in banking technology and the growth of platform players supporting digital banks will enable this segment to further expand and diversify while the banks that serve both their own customers and support other third party banks and fintechs will help to drive competition and bring about more choice and more options for customers in the future.

CategoriesIBSi Blogs Uncategorized

Facilitating open banking and open finance through secure services

Open banking is coming up to the fourth year of PSD2 as a regulatory requirement in the UK. We can see the impact it has already had, and the predicted growth for the year to come. In addition, the pandemic has driven the growing demand for flexible financial services, and this has transformed how consumers and small businesses leverage their financial data.

by Travis Spencer, CEO, Curity

Travis Spencer, CEO, Curity, discusses open banking, open finance security requirements
Travis Spencer, CEO, Curity

Open banking has allowed third-party organisations to access data through APIs to create a frictionless experience with better products and services to manage finances.

As APIs continue to give financial institutions the ability to connect to both customers and businesses alike, security has become more important than ever. It is vital to evaluate the various measures that financial services need to adopt to thrive in a safe and secure way.

Carefully managing financial data has always been of the utmost importance for businesses. Failing to do so and leaving sensitive data to fall into the wrong hands can be critical for consumers, businesses, and banks. Financial-grade API security is paramount when it comes to exchanging data and financial information between institutions and third parties such as FinTech vendors and other partners.

Complexities of authenticating

It is important to have solid confidence in the users’ identity. This requires a Strong Customer Authentication (SCA) method, which generally translates to a high Level of Assurance. This is accomplished to some degree by using multi-factor authentication. Similarly essential, users must prove their identity as part of the registration and authentication process. To achieve this, the regulators require standards-based proven methods that ultimately result in a token (i.e., a ticket or memento) that encrypts and secures the identity of the user, their authentication method, and provides assurance that the user represented by that token really is who they say they are.

Users confirming consent

Authentication is important, but, alone, it isn’t enough. Open finance regulations are clear that users must consent to a business accessing certain data or performing an action such as creating a transaction. But it must also be possible for users to manage and even revoke their consent through an easy-to-use user management service.

Protecting users’ data

Securing and protecting users’ data can be a difficult task, but it’s a critical one in open banking. It takes a long time to develop trust – particularly when finances are involved – and it can be slashed in seconds if users lose confidence in a business’s ability to look after them and their data. As well as costing customers time, money, and resulting in extreme dissatisfaction, this can ruin a business’s reputation. Consequently, the safety of user data must be prioritised.

A blend of various procedures, frameworks and processes can be introduced to mitigate the risk of fraud, leaking or manipulating data and violating privacy. This is an opportunity to ensure consistent security practices are implemented across the board. Standards and directives such as PSD2 are designed to protect user data, as well as securing bank services. Businesses need to ensure they are investing in the right technology to adhere to these standards. By choosing solutions that automatically implement these specifications, businesses can reap the benefits of a secure customer database which will help improve the customer experience to build credibility and trust.

Prioritising skills

Businesses must also invest in their teams. It’s not enough to simply put protocols in place. Design and execution require a specific set of skills which, unfortunately, are high in demand and low in supply. Recent research commissioned by the UK Department for Culture, Media and Sport found that half of businesses in the country (approx. 680,000) have a basic skills gap, lacking staff with the technical, incident response, and governance skills needed to manage their cyber security. Meanwhile, a third (approx. 449,000) are missing more advanced skills, such as penetration testing, forensic analysis, and security architecture.

Regardless of being essential – considerably more so as services are progressively digitalised, cybersecurity skills are often poorly understood and undervalued by both management boards and within IT teams. This can prompt a lack of investment in training, mishiring, and poor retention of staff in security roles. This only intensifies the challenge of building a team that possesses the requisite skills.

Hiring can be hard when there’s a deficiency of skills and abilities, so businesses need to be innovative. This means considering new recruitment avenues and, importantly, breaking free from the conventional model of what cyber security professionals look like. Curiosity is vital, so, for more junior roles especially, attitude should be a key qualification. Businesses should trust that many skills can be acquired on the job if the candidate has the essential fundamental knowledge and drive. To help with this, employers should provide training and mentorship.

The future is looking bright for financial services. The way banks do business and how consumers manage their financial transactions will continue to revolutionise. New opportunities and new practices are likely to arise meaning security remains an important factor to combat any future requirements.

As we continue to assess financial-grade security and authentication protocols, success will also rely heavily on expertise and know-how. The skills gap in security needs to be considered to ensure that flexible finance options within open banking and open finance can be utilised without compromising security. Businesses must ensure they are prioritising training for the team to close this skills gap and improve practices across the industry. There is a massive opportunity to push protocols and standards across the board, as it will not only help to ensure a high level of security but also makes skills more transferable in the long term.

CategoriesIBSi Blogs Uncategorized

Embedded payments in physical stores will help boost digital payments

Payments
Senior Vice President, Worldline India

The Indian government has achieved the milestone of inoculating over 150 crore vaccines. With the progressive unlocking happening in the majority of cities and villages across the country, the Omicron-led contagious third wave is anticipated to come under control soon.

by Vishal Maru, Senior Vice President Merchant Payment Services, Loyalty and Digital Payments, Worldline India

Physical shopping is regaining its lost glory as small retail outlets, malls are opening up while native markets are thriving. Amid all this, the requirement for quick, secure, contactless digital transactions remains a top priority for merchants and consumers alike.

Making embedded payment solutions available to all or any merchants across the country can help address these growing needs. Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) solution has become critical for physical stores to assist in keeping track of inventory, system, and payment ledgers of the business. Today, most digital payment solution providers are realising the benefits of enabling ERP solution providers to integrate their billing software with POS terminals.

How does an embedded payment system work?

The embedded payment is about integrating payments options with enterprise resource planning platforms used by the merchants. This automates the process of entering the purchase amount manually in the POS terminals. It captures the card transaction details within the billing software for merchants. At the physical store, the selected items are added to the cart for billing by the merchant and therefore the system reflects the ultimate price including local taxes and discounts if any. Customers can pay by their preferred digital mode instantly because the waiting time is drastically reduced.

An advantage to the merchants

The Integrated system enables a merchant to supply quicker check-outs and error-free payment acceptance to the cardholders additionally to a quicker reconciliation of card transactions. Embedded payments on Android POS terminals make it a furthermore powerful and useful gizmo for merchants to manage their enterprise end-to-end because it is a mini kiosk with all features like payments, billing, inventory, reconciliation, customer loyalty, credit/cash history, BNPL, etc. on one single platform.

Embedded payments modernising most sectors

Embedded payments are changing the way businesses accept payment. It’s getting adopted across wide merchant categories like retail stores, hospitals and pharmacies, hotels, and quick service restaurants among others. This can not only help merchants to supply innovative payment acceptance but also first-of-its-kind contactless payment but automating their current billing processes and enhancing payment acceptance modes for quicker checkouts.

The growth within the size of the embedded payments is primarily thanks to increased government focus and initiatives that are aimed toward digitising the economy. It’s not to mention the customer-centric innovation that the industry is bringing to the table. As an example, POS terminals aren’t any longer limited to facilitating card transactions, it accepts payments via NFC-powered contactless cards, QR codes, UPI and offers several value-added services like EMI, DCC, among others. Additionally, it offers services like accounting and inventory management, payroll management, merchant financing, etc.

The connected POS helps hospitality players lead sales, invoicing, and orders at restaurants, rooms, activities, meals, and hotel boutiques. It will not only work in a restaurant but also for hotel activities, the boutique, and room service moreover. It ensures a connection between a hotels’ various departments, making it more efficient for the deployer while offering a flawless high-end customer experience.

From better inventory management to simplified invoicing, quick payments, and absolute customer satisfaction, embedded payments are adding value to the business and enhancing customer experience in every possible way for better and greater achievements.

CategoriesIBSi Blogs Uncategorized

FinTech’s impact on UK banking

Over the last decade, FinTech has transformed UK banking. This was most prominently seen in the rise of challenger banks like Revolut and Starling and remittance companies like Wise. Unencumbered by the need for branches and sensing chronic disillusionment with traditional banking, the newcomers created systems and products that customers wanted, often at better prices than traditional banks could offer.

by Philipp Buschmann, Co-Founder and CEO of AAZZUR

This sent those banks scrambling to frantically bring their products into the 21st century. All so they could offer a customer experience that matched that of the challengers.  This genuine focus on customer experience is FinTech’s most visible legacy. Thanks to the positive customer relationships companies fostered, incumbent banks now face an expectant customer base who are willing to move to get what they want.

Philipp Buschmann, Co-Founder and CEO of AAZZUR on UK banking
Philipp Buschmann, Co-Founder and CEO of AAZZUR

That’s just the tip of the transformation. FinTech has reimagined what it means to even be a bank through Banking-as-a-Service (BaaS). This, combined with the data opportunities afforded by Open Banking, is FinTech’s real legacy and where the sector’s new players still lead most incumbent banks.

Traditionally a bank controls every aspect of its services. BaaS allows FinTechs to integrate their systems with each other to expand their own offerings or profit from others integrating theirs. Take Starling for example. It benefits hugely from opening its payment rails to companies like SumUp and MasterCard while simultaneously offering its own customers the services of FinTechs like Wealthify and PensionBee.

Traditional players in UK banking are already getting in on the action. Lloyds is working with Thought Machine, RBS with 11:FS. By integrating with some of the most innovative companies in the world they are able to vastly expand and improve their own offerings with relative ease. The most exciting bit is it’s not just banks doing this. Any retail business can now offer a vast ecosystem of financial products.

What, though, does this mean for investment in the sector? The end of the last decade saw billions of VC and private equity dollars annually pumped into FinTech. But the planet is a volatile place right now. It is this, more than anything else, that will dictate the direction of investment.

In times of crisis, investors seek safety, so expect a shift towards sure bets. In UK banking, this already seems to be the case. The biggest benefactors will be the largest FinTechs. Companies like Revolut, Starling and Wise are now, just like the very banks they were created to challenge, simply too big to fail.

Another big factor will be where traditional banks invest. As they continue to mirror the challengers, innovation seems most likely. Either internally or by partnering with smaller, agile firms like AAZZUR and focusing on the benefits of BaaS and embedded finance.

Further down the FinTech ladder, smaller startups are most at the mercy of the market. If global volatility stays roughly the same or decreases, investment should continue. The level of innovation at some of these companies is too high not to support.

But if something throws the globe – and, in turn, the markets – into prolonged chaos, expect funding to dry up for almost everyone but the biggest names. And if 2008 showed us anything, a few big scalps are still to be expected.

It’s this that makes me so certain embedded finance and BaaS are set to see an investment surge. Both from investors and businesses themselves. Why? Because they allow traditionally sluggish businesses to finally start turning a profit, offering their investors a genuine return. Most importantly, it allows them to detach themselves from investment life support.

Right now, that’s just good business but at some point, that could mean survival.

CategoriesIBSi Blogs Uncategorized

How FinTech can drive more women into the tech industry

The FinTech industry is constantly evolving, making it a rather exciting sector to be in. New solutions are continuously being developed to transform the way we bank and pay for goods and services both domestically and internationally. However, just like the rest of the technology industry, for many decades, this sector has been dominated by men. Luckily, this is changing.

by Terry Monteith, SVP Acquiring & Payments at BlueSnap

I have witnessed the shift throughout my career. I started my professional journey at a large financial institution. By the time I joined BlueSnap in 2013, I noticed a big difference, in not only the number of women entering the industry in more junior roles but in the number of women who were taking on senior leadership roles with decision-making responsibilities. This has only grown since then, and I have noticed this trend towards equality in many other tech/fintech organisations.

Having said that, there are still some barriers to women entering the industry. It is important that we unpack these hurdles and spotlight the solutions so we can drive more inclusivity within the industry.

The barriers for women in fintech/tech

women
Terry Monteith, SVP Acquiring & Payments at BlueSnap

There is a need to educate people about the various paths into tech. There is a misconception that you need a coding background in order to enter the industry, which isn’t true at all. The people I work with come from various disciplines. Hence, there is more we can do to show people the range of roles available in the industry.

And for those that want to learn to code, there are so many online platforms that aren’t expensive (some are free) that will allow them to develop this skillset from the comforts of their own home. We are happy to see some universities adding Fintech tracks to their curriculums.

A lack of work flexibility can also act as a deterrent for women either entering the industry or climbing to those senior positions. When putting together work policies, it is important that companies consider the work-life balance that people now demand – such as remote workdays and flexible work hours. This will help foster a more inclusive workplace.

How to encourage more women into tech

The key to attracting more women into the industry is by creating a healthy work environment that people regardless of gender want to be a part of and stay in. Having a senior management team with multiple women makes women in all positions more open to your organisation. When the culture is right, it makes it easier to just focus on hiring the right talent.

One of the first things people do when looking for a job or preparing for an interview is to go on platforms like LinkedIn, to understand who the key stakeholders are. Therefore, when they see diversity throughout the company, especially at the top, they will feel more welcome. It’s one of those things where, if you can see it, then you can be it.

At BlueSnap for example, we have created a culture where women feel welcome and are able to rise to very senior positions. Our senior executive team is very balanced between the number of men and women. A third of BlueSnap’s senior executive team are women and it’s worth noting that there are a number of women in senior-level positions, including coding and developing.

Key considerations for women entering FinTech

There is so much to learn about fintech. I would encourage people to think globally. For example, if you are based in the US, where payments are quite a card centric, it is imperative that you know what’s happening in other countries. And learn about those emerging payment trends. Understanding the big picture will place you in a better position to get ahead. The more you know, the more positioned you are to help.

Additionally, payments are a detailed oriented business. You have to get into the weeds of things. So, learn about the little frames that help tell the big picture, and understand the importance of keeping things simple.

Throughout my career, I have strived to be part of what’s next in finance, banking, and payments. I’m inquisitive by nature, so thinking about where the industry is headed has always helped me navigate my career and be a part of the continuous evolution of the sector.

CategoriesIBSi Blogs Uncategorized

Are cryptocurrencies becoming too mainstream?

As cryptocurrencies become ever more mainstream, blue-chip names are anxious not to be left behind in the crypto stampede. With Goldman Sachs predicting that bitcoin will increasingly compete with gold as a store of value, banks and major corporates are eagerly seeking to extend their crypto footprint.

Africa
Manoj Mistry, Managing Director, IBOS Association

by Manoj Mistry, Managing Director, IBOS Association

The most recent big name to join them is the Canadian arm of KPMG, which recently announced that it had added ethereum (ETH) and bitcoin (BTC) to its balance sheet, making it the first of the Big Four to invest in decentralised digital currencies.

By doing so, the accounting giant has joined legions of crypto investors worldwide. According to Statista, the global number of Blockchain wallet users has already surpassed 81 million with some analysts estimating that the total figure now exceeds 200 million. Figures published by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) estimate that there are around 2.5 million cryptocurrency owners in the UK.

KPMG’s strategic decision can be interpreted as a reflection of the market’s direction of travel: an explosion of investor interest in crypto and increasing participation in other blockchain technologies, such as NFTs (non-fungible tokens) and decentralised finance (DeFi) technology, that has simply become too big to ignore.

The managing partner at KPMG’s Canada office, Benjie Thomas, was distinctly upbeat when he announced the move. “This investment reflects our belief that institutional adoption of cryptoassets and blockchain technology will continue to grow and become a regular part of the asset mix,” he said.

A few weeks later, KPMG Canada went further: buying a World of Women NFT (Woman #2681) for a reported 25 ETH (US$73,000), acquiring an Ethereum Name Service domain name – a tool that makes cryptocurrency addresses more user-friendly – and minting kpmgca.eth.

KPMG is not alone. Many banks have also recognised cryptocurrencies as a maturing asset class: 55 per cent of the world’s 100 biggest banks by assets under management are now investing directly or indirectly in companies and projects related to cryptocurrencies and blockchain, according to Blockdata.

In allocating bitcoin and ethereum to its corporate treasury, KPMG also follows in the footsteps of major companies such as MicroStrategy, Square and Tesla, which are now holding crypto on their balance sheets. Tesla’s CEO Elon Musk has been a keen advocate of crypto, having publicly stated that his personal portfolio includes bitcoin, ethereum and dogecoin. Meanwhile, Tesla’s most recent accounts reveal that the company held almost $2 billion worth of Bitcoin holdings last year.

The absence of specific regulation is arguably part of crypto’s appeal. But as the combined market value of all cryptocurrencies breached the $2 trillion mark in 2021, financial markets and investors knew that key global regulators were set to respond to what they perceived as high levels of risk.

UK regulators have set the rhetorical pace. The FCA and the Bank of England have both cautioned investors in uncharacteristically strong language to help them appreciate the risks: fraud, hacking, money laundering, sanctions risks, as well as general market and credit risks.

In the US, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has repeatedly suggested that fundamental questions exist about the legitimacy and stability of cryptocurrencies and that the US should implement an appropriate regulatory framework.

Despite these siren voices, bespoke regulatory regimes for crypto have not yet been put in place on either side of the Atlantic, although it can only be a matter of time before they are.

Canada also has no crypto-specific regulations. Instead, cryptos are regulated under the country’s securities laws – part of the mandate of Canada’s 13 securities regulatory agencies (SRAs), established by ten provincial and three territorial governments.

Not considered legal tender under the Bank of Canada Act, cryptocurrencies are classified as a commodity rather than money, while Canadian securities laws treat cryptos as tokens, classifying them as securities.

But Canada’s regulatory framework is distinctly more supportive of crypto than the US, which may have been a driver for KPMG’s local move into crypto. Notably, the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) allow financial innovations to test the waters for a designated period of time, during which they are exempt from the compliance rules under existing securities regulation.

The CSA is also breaking fresh ground in defining the contractual right to custodied crypto assets as a security, making Canada the first jurisdiction in the world to do so. This potentially puts Canadian crypto players on a path to experience the type of regulation that is not yet seen elsewhere.

Like other cryptos, bitcoin and ethereum are regarded by investors as speculative assets. Beyond their inherent volatility, KPMG’s decision to add digital assets to its balance sheet creates other potential risks including anti-money laundering (AML) and the future of tax reform.

For the partners of KPMG Canada, there are also compliance considerations. These extend to areas for which banks are typically responsible: security and AML checks. Notably, the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) has no specific provisions that detail how to account for cryptocurrencies.

Big corporations’ involvement in crypto is both exciting and welcome. Having crossed that investment Rubicon, however, they will have to implement and maintain effective regulation and supervision in order to prevent white-collar crime, money laundering and cybersecurity breaches, among other issues.

CategoriesIBSi Blogs Uncategorized

3 ways AI optimisation can revolutionise the financial sector

Financial services are increasingly implementing AI technologies in order to help analyse massive volumes of data, identify market trends and prioritise tasks. On top of this, it is being used to identify fraud, personalise the customer journey, as well as cyber security and general risk management.

by Dr Leslie Kanthan, CEO and Co-Founder, TurinTech

Dr Leslie Kanthan, CEO and Co-Founder, TurinTech

The volume of information and data generated by financial institutions is huge, and AI is proving to be a pivotal cog in the sector machine by handling this data more efficiently. 

According to a past Accenture report, banks could increase revenue by 34% by this year if they invest more readily in artificial intelligence. Fortunately, this report also concluded that in general the banking industry and its executives and employees were optimistic and positive about the impact AI could have on their organisation. 

It comes as no surprise that as of February 2022, 56% of financial firms have implemented AI in business domains like risk management and 52% in revenue generation areas.

So where are we today? Is AI just another buzzword or can it really help deliver efficiency and increase productivity in the financial sector? Let’s dive into three important ways AI optimisation can revolutionise the financial sector.

Empowering innovation at speed and scale

Operationalising AI at scale is still a big issue for many companies, with IDC citing only 25% of firms running an AI project having developed an “enterprise-wide” AI strategy and many of these projects are doomed to fail

Operating in a highly regulated industry, financial institutions often have to trade-off between model performance and explainability. But this is where AI optimisation can help, which uses AI to optimise model and code, enabling full transparency and explainability, without compromising on the accuracy and running speed of the model.

Unlike other AI automation tools, AI optimisation platforms can help financial firms build custom models with multiple criteria, at scale. What this means for financial services is that these tools can create better and faster algorithms for their unique business problems, optimising business processes efficiently and effectively.

Elevate ESG compliance with greener AI

A Global Data survey reported how the pandemic has pushed ESG executives to increase their focus and action on ESG issues. 

As an industry, it’s time to reconsider our carbon footprint and start to prioritise sustainable change. WWF and Greenpeace report that UK Financial Institutions were responsible for 805 million tonnes of CO2 emissions, almost 1.8 times the UK’s domestically produced emissions.

AI optimisation will be a force for good in meeting sustainability goals, with machine learning models becoming faster, more efficient, and consuming less energy. Green AI ultimately integrates technology and sustainability into a unified ecosystem. 

With more change and uncertainty to come in the year ahead, AI optimisation will be there to support and transform those businesses that are willing to rethink existing processes and agendas. Ultimately every organisation has a responsibility to be contributing positively to the climate crisis, and optimising processes is certainly a step in the right direction.

Accelerate algorithmic trading speed and improve accuracy

According to Coalition Greenwich’s report, 28% of FX executives said they are currently using execution algos, with 51% confirming they intend to increase their use of algos. 

If and when applied correctly, AI can bring impactful benefits to algo trading. Take, for example, a case when a hedge fund’s statistical models are underperforming, unable to take advantage of more complicated patterns in ever-increasing data types and volumes (e.g. Market price and volume data, third party data, proprietary data).

What can the trading team do? 

By leveraging AI optimisation platforms to accelerate the end-to-end trading strategy development process,  they can create dozens of optimal models in days for different prediction needs, such as the price, price percentage change, up/down momentum, on large amounts of data. The fund can then automatically identify the most effective signals among thousands of data features, avoiding spending hours to do so manually. Applying this to the real world can make trading strategy development 25 times faster and increase the annual return rate by 90%. 

The bottom line

Through the use of AI technology, the financial sector is able to significantly improve its performance and revenue in more ways than one. McKinsey estimates that AI could generate up to $1 trillion additional value annually for the banking industry globally.

Furthermore, in today’s constantly evolving landscape, staying innovative and agile is crucial. Having technology that not only empowers this change and innovation at scale but compliments it with ESG  considerations will be of huge importance to the sector moving forward. Vital innovation is required to be implemented at speed and scale in order to keep up with competitors, which can be achieved through the implementation of AI. 

Call for support

1800 - 123 456 78
info@example.com

Follow us

44 Shirley Ave. West Chicago, IL 60185, USA

Follow us

LinkedIn
Twitter
YouTube